US Tacit Support for Mideast Autocrats reeks of short-sightedness, undermines US interests

The winds of change are blowing over the Middle East from Jordan to Algeria.

A couple of weeks ago, Tunisia became the first Arab nation to succeed in shaking off decades of debilitating dictatorship through a popular uprising that sent shock waves through the entire region.

Egyptians who have long voiced discontent with their government are now taking to the streets in unprecedented numbers demanding change. If Egypt succeeds, analysts agree that a domino effect is likely.

Having withered decades of institutionalized corruption, police brutality and lack of freedoms under despotic regimes, Arab citizenries are finally beginning to believe that freedom and democracy are within reach. Their demands are straight-forward: democratically elected governments that truly represent and serve their citizens, in place of apathetic despots that work against the interests of their own citizens. They dream of free elections, government transparency, bureaucratic accountability, and rule of law.

It is perplexing that in the ensuing confrontation between citizens longing for democracy and iron-fisted dictators clamping down on dissent in the Arab world, the US official policy is to side with the dictators.

From the perspective of US interests, it is a severely misguided policy that could soon prove its short-sightedness.

To a certain extent, the US government’s blurry vision when it comes to the Arab world is a victim of its own simplistic two-bit approach to the region: lust for oil and fear of Islamism. As such, “good” regimes are ones that facilitate our access to the region’s natural resources, and that successfully crack down on Islamist movements. From Ben Ali to Mubarak to King Abdullah, that seems to be enough to declare them our “allies.”

Whether in Congress or in the media, our public discourse on the Middle East is so skewed exclusively in these two directions, it almost comes off as willful ignorance.

Despite evidence on the ground that is increasingly hard to miss, we have somehow convinced ourselves that the Arab world suffers from an inherent aversion to Western freedoms and a burning desire to turn back the clock to a medieval caliphate. Our close relationship with Israel and its lobby in Washington, in whose best interest it is to actively reinforce this minimalist misconception at every opportunity, further limits our reading of the region and sets up the intellectual justification for our policy of supporting autocratic Arab regimes who fulfill these two criteria. Naturally, the Arab dictators have themselves lobbied hard to convince Washington that they are the only viable alternative to violent Islamist rule.

But the successful populist revolt in Tunisia and the organic push for democracy in Egypt are offering an entirely different reality; one that should act as a wake up call for the US to quickly reassess its approach.

In Tunisia, the Jasmin Revolution was not ideologically religious in nature, nor was it hatched by opposition parties. It was a raw expression of everyday Tunisian citizens from every walk of life who rose up in one voice demanding civic reform, freedom, dignity, and democracy.

Similarly, in Egypt, demand for change has little to do with religion or the West, and everything to do with fair wages, just government, free democratic elections, and constitutional oversight.

Better informed by unprecedented access to alternative media via the internet and satellite, and buoyed by the nimbleness of social media like Facebook and Twitter, Tunisians, Egyptians and other Arabs are better able to communicate their grievances (which are primarily of a civic nature) and effectively mobilize their dissent beyond the otherwise watertight state control of mass media and means of communication.

The Arab masses, who are more astute than we give them credit for, want us to know that our hypocrisy when it comes to their region is not missed upon them. On one hand they see the US paying lip-service to flowery calls for freedom and democracy like Obama did in his State of the Union address today and Bush before him; on the other, they note its tacit support for autocrats who deny them just that.

Egyptians were largely turned off, for instance, by US Secretary of State’s Hillary Clinton’s comments on the January 25 popular uprising in Egypt:

“I urge all people to exercise restraint. I support the fundamental right of expression, but our assessment is that the Egyptian government is stable and is looking for ways to respond to the legitimate needs and interests of the Egyptian people,” said Clinton.

Shukry, an Egyptian activist, responded on Facebook:

“Egyptians do not define epidemic police brutality, torture in prisons, and extrajudicial killings as restraint. We do not consider a government that forces an unelected president on us for over 30 years and that rigs our parliamentary elections to a whopping 97% win for its one party system to be stable. We do not consider firing tear gas and rubber bullets into peaceful demonstrations that demand fair wages and basic dignities for citizens to be a legitimate response to our needs.”

“Compare the American government’s statements and its media coverage of Iran after their corrupt elections and during the Iranian green street protest with that of Egypt for those exact same events,” said Nadia, an Egyptian street protester. “It is not hard to see a double standard.”

Watching endless hours of Egyptian satellite talk shows, talking to scores of Egyptians on the street, and monitoring Facebook groups set up by Egyptian protesters, it is my assessment that Nadia and Shukry have a much more accurate reading of the general sentiments of Egyptians than Hillary Clinton.

Ironically, as Tunisians, Egyptians and other Arabs succeed in their push for freedom and democracy, Anti-Americanism may be on the rise. But it is not because of Arab support for terrorism or religious extremism or because of inherent hatred for our Western freedoms as we wish to believe. To the contrary, it is because Arabs, especially the youth who are largely educated and who are leading the push for change, see the US as an enabler of the dictatorships that keep them oppressed – an enemy of their freedoms for short-term strategic gains.

The US would do well to recognize that religious fundamentalism in the Arab world is more served than hindered by oppressive regimes and institutionalized government corruption; that the number one factor contributing to anti-American sentiment among Arab peoples is our support for those regimes; and that America’s image and interests are best served by supporting populist Arab quests for self-determination – not by stifling them. It is in our interest to turn the US from villain to hero, once again respected and looked up to. It is in our interest to not waste our money appeasing certain dictators while spilling our blood deposing others.

With or without us, Arabs will eventually succeed in overthrowing autocratic regimes and installing free democracies in their place. It would be shameful – perhaps even disastrous – if we remain on the wrong side of history.

UPDATE: Since the time of this article’s writing, the State department has improved its rhetoric and called on Mubarak to respect his citizens and introduce reforms. But timid politically correct rhetoric does not make for policy. Though an improvement over Clinton’s initial remarks, it remains as window dressing so long as it comes without action. The US policy of supporting and empowering Mubarak’s dictatorial regime as a “US ally” remains in tact.

Email, Print, Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Bloglines
  • Wikio
  • Google Bookmarks
  • YahooBuzz
  • Live-MSN
  • Ask
  • Netscape
This entry was posted in On Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to US Tacit Support for Mideast Autocrats reeks of short-sightedness, undermines US interests

  1. Hameed Hindi al-Askandari says:

    The double standards are bold and multi-faceted, policy makers and lobby groups in the Capitols of the West, especially D.C. are shaking in their boots as the antiquated and strained status quo suffers Zilzal after Zilzal the time for self-determination has arrived, the era of dictatorship will not be returned to once the cup of Freedom has been teasingly sipped!

  2. MYT says:

    your point of view and analysis revealed in this article are sorely needed. The US State Department, through Clinton, is exposing two embarrassing truths about our understanding (or lack thereof) of the Arab World: 1- that whatever we say will be given weight (evidenced by the fact that Clinton felt that she needed to call on people to exercise restraint and that they would respond); and 2- that we are clueless about what has been fueling anti-Americanism in thinking that if left to the will of the people they will automatically choose an inherently anti-west/anti-life ideology.

  3. Pingback: Tweets that mention US Tacit Support for Mideast Autocrats reeks of short-sightedness, undermines US interests | --

  4. Raid Mohammad says:

    Now you are talking Ahmed. My hat goes to you and to all the dignified Egyptians. Oh you the descendants of the Fatimid, restore back to us our long-lost honor and dignity. May Allah grant Egypt and Egyptians, and all the oppressed of the world, the promised victory. Keep on rookin. Hatha wa Assalaam, Raid Mohammad

  5. Judy says:

    Thank you, Ahmed Rebab, for going to Egypt at this critical time, and for speaking so eloquently about the history and truth of this popular uprising in Egypt. I have been visiting Egypt yearly during the past 26 years of my marriage to an Egyptian (now American) national. My Egyptian in-laws are moderate, middle class, educated professionals who have been privately starving for political freedom ever since I first met them. I have watched my nieces and nephews grow up trying to deal with the oppression that results in stifled creativity, low self-esteem, depression, and the repression of intellectual growth and understanding. I have marveled at their ability to survive and see truth in spite of the obstacles placed in front of them. My heart is soaring to see this young generation of Egyptians finally break through the fear – the very well-founded fear – that has kept them quiet for so long. I pray that the Mubarak regime will, by some miracle, finally understand that it is really in their own best interest, as well as that of the entire nation of Egypt (and the United States, as you so clearly explain), to step down and allow this transition to democracy to unfold in the most peaceful way possible. I pray for the safety of all.

    • Laura Ashley says:

      I could not agree more with you Judy. I am a friend of Egypt. I have visisted there and love the country and her people. I pray that Mubarak will step down and a true election will occur. This article was refreshing and to the point. I wrote to President Obama through the White House email system expressing my concerns with this situation. I am only one voice but I am crying out for the people in Eygpt. I am also praying for the safety of all.

  6. Bob says:

    Have you sent this to the president? The US must tread carefully through this. Clinton’s shift in statements will be as slow as the events on the ground. No one knows how this event will end.


  7. Stephanie Douglas says:

    Well written piece. Thanks for the info. Keep up the work. Personally, I hope this mini domino affect will continue to grow across the middle east. And wherever there is a dictator or a terrible leader, lets see change.

  8. Abdul Rahman says:

    I don’t think any of these revolutions are religiously motivated. If by religious you mean every person has realized that there needs to be change and they are relying on their intellect, on their faith in Allah, then yes, this is a religious revolution.

  9. Pingback: US Tacit Support for Mideast Autocrats reeks of short-sightedness, undermines US interests | Ahmed Rehab

  10. Lissie G says:

    A French ISP offers a free dial-up internet access against Egyptian censorship. Number : +33 1 72 89 01 50. Login: toto Password: toto

    • Lissie G says:

      also Telecomix is providing dialup modem service for people in Egypt: +46850009990 user/pass: telecomix/telecomix

      only for Egypt please

  11. Lissie G says:

    QSL to any HAM operators in Europe. The Egyptian resistance want to connect with you on 7.110MHz

  12. Umar says:

    Thank you very much for your hard work and contribution in covering this.

    Genuine reporting from the ground on the issues – sans political rhetoric – is desperately needed, especially here in the US. The American people need more exposure to the truths underlying this issue, so that they can properly petition their government for just action.

    Continue your hard work, and spread the word.

  13. Ilia says:

    Well, there was a similar revolution of the young and educated. It was in Iran in 1979 and I am pretty sure that there were a lot of young Muslims telling that at the time that the US policy is misguided etc. , that the freedom was coming…
    Let’s see who was right. There is only one real organized opposition force in Egypt now and it is the Muslim Brotherhood. No, they are not leading the protests, but when the institutions crumble, make no mistake, they will be there. Or they will take the power through elections. Be careful what you wish for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>